The bar chart below illustrate four different methods off waste disposal in four countries, respectively is: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Overall, landfill is the highest feature in Toronto while the compositing is the lowest feature in Amman. As can be seen from the bar chart, landfill is the highest method of waste disposal in Toronto, it in about seventy-five proportion and the lowest of this method is in Kuala Lumpur, which is in about fifteen percent. The percentage about landfill witnessed a fluctuated trend in two cities is Toronto and Kuala Lumpur. In contrast, compositing method has the lowest point in a four cities and Amman city is the place that compositing reach a lowest point, in nearly five proportion. However, three cities respectively is Toronto, Madrid and Kuala Lumpur witnessed a lightly fluctuate. Recycling is the last feature that I mentioned in this report and the highest proportion of this method is in Madrid, it just over twenty and with eight proportion of recycling, Toronto is the city that has a lowest proportion at recycling.
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 56
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centers It is feared that this trend can bring negative influences on the youths and the society To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 697, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ity is the place that compositing reach a lowest point, in nearly five proportion...
^
Line 1, column 1049, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...recycling, Toronto is the city that has a lowest proportion at recycling.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07865168539 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77316482126 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477528089888 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5951033648 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499845243139 0.215688989381 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244876633705 0.103423049105 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185521690593 0.0843802449381 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.499845243139 0.15604864568 320% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.