The provided bar chart vividly illustrates the comparation of waste management in four cities including Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. In general, it is clearly apparent that landfill disposal is highly used in Toronto and Amman while the majority waste in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur is managed through incineration process.
Looking in more detail from the table, Toronto is the number one cities that burry their waste in landfill at around 75% of their total waste followed by Amman which use that method for managing their half waste. Meanwhile, Madrid and Kuala Lumpur only send 30% and 15% of their waste to landfill, respectively. On the other hand, incineration is the most frequent method chosen by Madrid and Kuala Lumpur to destroy their unwanted goods that counted at 40% and 55%, respectively. Interestingly, in this two cities a quarter of their total waste is recycled which much higher compared to Toronto and Amman that only recycled 10% or below of their junk. Finally, the four cities use compositing method the least compared to other methods that range between around 2 to 8% of their total sewage.
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
- Topic The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two period Summarise
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04812834225 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5298922111 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8779321346 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.857142857 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421493966543 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214212835479 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115909192098 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37082342737 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101605421265 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.