The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007
The bar graph indicates the length of time per week that young people spend doing certain movements in Chester from 2002 to 2007.
Watching television was the highest of all activities, and the number was the same first two years at 25, but it gradually increased per year, and the number peaked at about 38 in 2007, and it was the highest of all categories.
In conversely, Bowling was the lowest of all activities in every year. The number of Bowling increased and decreased per year, the last two years continued to go down. The number was approaching at 0, and finally at 1 in 2007.
Both doing homework and doing sport show the similar pattern from 2002 to 2007. The two categories reached a peak in 2002, but the two steadily decreased per year, and especially, the number of doing sports was the second lowest of all activities in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Komaldeep | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 11 | view |
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 56
- "The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007." H.H. 67
- In many parts of the world people are relying more and more on prepared food from grocery stores or restaurants because they are too busy to cook at home This is a bad idea because home cooked food is much better for us To what extent do you agree or disa 89
- The large number of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation syste 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 696.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60927152318 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46434154599 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503311258278 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5088280712 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263587654167 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147751830345 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144314241326 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202168600801 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16245269789 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.