The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, Between 2000 and 2009. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar chart elucidates the number of accommodations built every year in two distinctive countries, Derby and Nottingham, over nine years periods, from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, there were more houses built in Nottingham, compared to Derby, however, despite the lowest amount of accommodation at the beginning of the year, the number of constructed houses significantly increased to the peak in Derby at the end of the year.
To begin with, Nottingham was dominant about constructing more houses in 2000 with approximately 50 accommodations each year. In 2001, this quantity climbed to 54, and there were some fluctuations between 2002 and 2007. Finally, the number of constructed accommodations remarkably accelerated to almost 250 houses yearly in 2009.
Moreover, the most inadequate number of built houses in Derby was just 40 every year, and this amount rose to only 1 home per year in 2001. Despite, some fluctuations like Nottingham, between 2002 and 2006, the indicators of Derby were more than 100 houses per year in 2007, climbed significantly to the peak that was almost 350 houses per year in 2009.
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagram shows the relationship between a number of different languages 72
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extant do you agree or disagree 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be an effective 61
- The diagram below shows how Olive Oil is manufactured 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was almost 350 houses per year in 2009.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20555555556 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02301358103 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2070859138 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304494153949 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157863268541 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781009767097 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21314788392 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628677781063 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.