The bar chart below illustrates the sum of houses constructed between the year 2000 and 2009 in two cities.
In general, Derby city had maximum number of house build, whereas Nottingham had minimum unit of building set up . They had some fluctuation in the figure.
In the beginning. Nottingham town had 50 houses at first year, however the number increased and reached to around 53 build in the year 2001. Although highest figure of apartment had created in last year. In 2007 , approximately 198 residence were set up but least number of home were made in the year 2006. Ultimately, Nottingham had created smallest number of houses in every year .
Secondly, Derby municipality had made big sum of residence in the year 2009 but lowest figure in the year 2000. Relatively, in the year 2008 almost 275 home were constructed also in 2003 about 125 houses had been created in Derby city. Overall, big number of houses were made in Derby city in every era.
- PTE essay It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 61
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays celebrities increasingly have the status of role models in particular for younger people Do you see this as a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 and 2009 in two cities. In general, Derby city had maximum number of house b...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...gham had minimum unit of building set up . They had some fluctuation in the figure...
^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...however the number increased and reached to around 53 build in the year 2001. Alt...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d to around 53 build in the year 2001. Although highest figure of apartment had created...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rtment had created in last year. In 2007 , approximately 198 residence were set up...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8 residence were set up but least number of home were made in the year 2006. Ult...
^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce were set up but least number of home were made in the year 2006. Ultimately, ...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'created the smallest'.
Suggestion: created the smallest
...e year 2006. Ultimately, Nottingham had created smallest number of houses in every year . Sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... smallest number of houses in every year . Secondly, Derby municipality had mad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82424242424 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54171545621 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539393939394 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2224130318 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.3636363636 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3686898385 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144739567013 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123118670197 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256982541958 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122154081319 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.