The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cites, Derby and Nottingham, between 2000 and 2009.
The bar chart provides information about the average rate of houses built per year in Derby and Nottingham between 2000 and 2009. The data is in the number of houses per year.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given bar graph that, the number of houses was increased throughout the period, whereas Derby surpassed Nottingham in the given time.
To comments with, as regards Derby, accounted for below 50 houses in the year 2000, which rose to over 100 houses in the following two years. It reminded at 120 houses from 2003 to 2007, which increased drastically to over 250 houses by 2009, which reached the top position in this list.
Furthermore, the initial figure for houses in Nottingham comprised exact 50 houses in 2000, a fivefold decrement was observed bt 2002. In addition, the rate started an upward trend until 2006. In 2007, it inclined gaintly over 150 houses from 20 houses, which increased to below 250 houses by the end after a huge declined in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-13 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on di erent days 78
- The increased world demand for oil and gas has made it remote to untouched natural areas Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging these natural areas 56
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment 87
- Mobile phones have made life easier any one can Use a mobile phone to make answer work calls and home calls from any place 7 days of a week do you think this development has more positive effects or negative effects on the individual or society 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, whereas, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79289940828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.393196711 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4742013184 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406582648334 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187713590896 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153973103122 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265468526376 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186037788679 0.0819641961636 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.