The bar chart reveal information about the number of miles travelled annually for six different reasons by both genders.
Overall, men travelled more distance than women during a year. Work was the main reasons of travelling for men, while women had more interest in shopping.
To begin with, the total distance travelled by men for their work was 35,000 miles, which was more compare to 30,000 miles covered by women. By contrast, day trip was the least popular reason for travel among men and women. Furthermore, for entertainment purpose, 15,000 miles distance covered by males, which was 1.5 times of day trip distance, while almost 11,000 miles travelled by females, which was almost twice compared to day trip.
On the other hand, almost same number of miles travelled by both gender for the reason of taking children to school, which was around 27,000 miles by men and 26,000 miles by women. Meanwhile, women travelled 30,000 miles for the purpose of shopping, which was 5000 miles more than distance travelled for meeting of friends. This difference was almost same in males who travelled for same reasons, which was almost 27,500 miles for shopping and around 22,500 for meeting of friends.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels health and fitness is decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that technology has distract with their family members This is good or bad effect on people 78
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d around 22,500 for meeting of friends.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09547738693 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32201045045 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48743718593 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9975844776 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25478978052 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153849321545 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636339744777 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20522101469 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644628707409 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.