The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.

The bar chart illustrates the data of daily physical activities of the Australian male and female who from various age group in the period of 2010.
Overall, from the age group of 25 to over 65, women were more physically active than men. However, only 15 to 25 aged younger boys had seen more efficient than girls.
Turning to the chart in more details, the aged group of 15 to 25 years male had done 52.8% physical task where only 47.7% female were activated by regular physical work. By the growing age, 25 to 44 aged men had become less active than women, which stands for men 42.2% & 39.5% respectively, in case of women it were 48.9% and 52.5%.
Furthermore, from the age group of men (45 to 54) had become slightly active, which was 43.1%, which comparatively less than women. In this aged group of ladies were the most activated among others groups and it stand 53.3% At the age of 55 to 64 of both genders had been barely increased in proportion than previous aged group. On the other hand, 65 to over age both genders were showing similar daily physical activity.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-11 min ng 67 view
Essays by user ismatjahan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 52.5%. Furthermore, from the age group of men 45 to 54 had become slightly acti...
^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stands'?
Suggestion: stands
...st activated among others groups and it stand 53.3% At the age of 55 to 64 of both ge...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53608247423 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30794300633 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6747771967 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362097140209 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179094792219 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917697303034 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252009211818 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715998749065 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.