The diagram illustrates how Australians in some stage of life practiced for a healthy life in 2010 by figures.
Overall, the number of males exercising on a regular basis were at a higher level than female. The elderly, though, did healthy activities rather equal.
The men seemed to be enthusiastic with exercise than women from 25 to 64 years old. In the age of 35 to 44, the difference of proportion between males and females was by far the clearest, with 52,5 and 39,5 percent respectively. Although that, the gap in percentages was narrowed steadily when they reach the age of 64. Between the four age groups, the group exercising most is from 45 to 54 years old, with the highest mark was around 53,3 percent.
There was a different trend in doing physical activity of men and women in the early and later ages. Younger women did exercise quite a lot, even overtake men. Conversely, older people tended to do physical activity in the same quantities.
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- the bar chart below shows the number of research students studying a different subject in 2005
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comp 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74850299401 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62895392873 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652694610778 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5375206076 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263110472573 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939011149722 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517635549637 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130779604436 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689235149544 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.