The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The bar chart provides information about the rate of Australian men and women who did regular physical exercises of distinct age groups in the year 2010.

Overall, men and women both groups had fluctuations. Although, men had highest rate in the younger generation, it gradually decreased in following groups. On the other hand women had lowest percenst at the beginning, it went upward in the following generations.

Men of 15-24 age group participated 52.8% and it fell to 42.2% in 25 to 34 age group, after that it gradually decreased by approximately three percent. In the next group percentage went to around 43%. Moreover, in the older generations 55 to 64 and 65 and more increased slightly around two percent in the former one and approximately1.5% in later one.

The regular physical activity of women of 15 to 24 cohort participated around 5% less than men. However, the remaining women groups outraced men's percentage. It rise slightly to 48.9% in 25 to 34 group. In the following group raised approximately 4%. Next two generations rate also similar to previous one approximately. The older generation 65 and above percentage dropped to 47.1.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
... groups had fluctuations. Although, men had highest rate in the younger generation, it grad...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cohort' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cohorts'.
Suggestion: cohorts
... physical activity of women of 15 to 24 cohort participated around 5% less than men. H...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...men groups outraced mens percentage. It rise slightly to 48.9% in 25 to 34 group. In...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0942408377 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06629329096 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.225400436 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8461538462 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356810969833 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119537513368 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129111639743 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240605162975 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158580326221 0.0819641961636 193% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.