The given bar chart illustrates the personal expenditure on five major categories (health care, transportation, food and housing) in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Japan in 2009.The given data is calculate in percentage.
It is evident from the chart that in 2009, the proportion of expenditure on food was highest at starting around 24% by Japan which was followed by United Kingdom by 20%, while there was slight difference between the United States and Canada (almost 14% and 15% respectively). On the other hand, people of USA outlay approximately 5% more money on housing than Canada that was around 21%. Similarly, british invest almost 24% and Japanese spent money near about 22%.
Furthermore, in terms of transportation, USA and UK had little bit difference in percentage of spending (about 16% and 15%). Canada, however, had 5% more expense as opposed to England that was 15%. After that figure was dropped in all nations significantly in which Japanese spent almost same on both health care and clothing (4%), whilst USA prefer clothing almost half of health care (that was 4%) expenditure and Canada spent double of health care on clothes which was around 7% in 2009.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that United States had highest personal spending than Canada, UK and Japan in all categories. Whereas, USA spent more money on housing and less on clothing , England invest less money on health care.
- Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion? 61
- Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attraction in a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Children are facing more pressure nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to solve this problem. 73
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in childhood obesity, while others think it is the fault of the parents. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'categories'' or 'category's'?
Suggestion: categories'; category's
... the personal expenditure on five major categories health care, transportation, food and h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...anada, United Kingdom and Japan in 2009.The given data is calculate in percentage. ...
^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'calculated'.
Suggestion: calculated
...dom and Japan in 2009.The given data is calculate in percentage. It is evident from th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...terms of transportation, USA and UK had little bit difference in percentage of spending ab...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of spending about 16% and 15%. Canada, however, had 5% more expense as opposed ...
^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
... can be clearly seen that United States had highest personal spending than Canada, UK and J...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re money on housing and less on clothing , England invest less money on health car...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04237288136 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66148751985 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5221841864 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.222222222 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236349335358 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101047289993 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14112504128 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187026464304 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157908786347 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.