The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given grapth compares the percentage of spending on different categories in the United States, Canada, the UK, and Japan in the year 2009.
Overall, while food, accomodation, and transportation made up the highest rate, medical care and fashion were much lower. It is clear that such countries spending the most on housing.
Locking at the three highest categories, the United State citizens spent over 25% of their total spending on accomodation, which was the highest rate in the chart. Following this, the figures for the United Kingdom, Japan, and Canada were around 23%, 22%, and 21%, respectively. In terms of food, this shares accounted for 23% in Japan, while this figure was 3% lower in UK. Regarding transportation, Canadians spent 20% of their total expenditure on this category, doubling this figure for Japan.
Turning to the remaining categories, medical expenses took up around 7% in the US, while Canada and Japan had nearly 4% each. Canadians spent more than 5% of their total spending on fashion, followed closely by the other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 61
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a salmon 78
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollowed closely by the other countries.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15606936416 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72953583341 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1133878825 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175044595099 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074363144838 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071616339893 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102993037619 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871534825561 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.