The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
The provided bar chart illustrates the comparison of the amount of electricity between production and consumption in ten countries in 2014.
At first glance, while nine out of ten countries contributed to higher figures of electric production than those of consumption, the produced quantities always outnumbered the consumption in Germany.
On average, the majority of both electricity production and consumption belonged to China, which accounted for exactly 5398 kWh and 5322 kWh respectively. Next came the US with just over 4000kWh for production and 3866 kWh for consumption. Russia, Japan, and India experienced lower figures for both data, but they were still higher than the rest of the countries.
Looking at the bar chart in more detail, we can see that the amount of electric generation was 233 kWh as large as consumption in the United States. In addition, there was approximately 119 kWh of electric production in Canada much more than in consumption. Nevertheless, the smallest gap in electric generation and consumption went to Russia, at only 19 kWh. Besides, around 56 kWh difference between the figures for electric consumption and production in Germany in 2014.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole 89
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not the best place to find information 84
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33689839572 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10392684569 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550802139037 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0150505912 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381752227127 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182017587672 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122832424868 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27035643832 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121889098265 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.