Bar chart
The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below illustrates how many minutes ( in billions ) of telephone calls used at UK, including three call types in the course of 7 years starting in 1995.
Overall, looking at the gragh it is immediately obvious that local-fixed line accounts for highest minutes. And it wasn't increases at all the time like national and international- fixed line and mobiles (all calls).
In a period of 4 years since 1995, local-fixed line which stood at about 72 billion minutes in 1995 increases continuity for all the period ( it reached at 90 billion minutes in 1999) . From 1999 to 2002, it decreases continuity from 90 billion minutes to nearly 70 billion minutes.
At all the period of 7 years, national and international- fixed line increases progressively, at first the figure stood at about 35 billion minutes and after 7 years it increase about 25 billion minutes. A similar trend was witnessed in mobiles ( all calls ) which increase slightly in 4 years since 1995 and increase sharply from 1999 to 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chart below illustrates how many minutes in billions of telephone calls used at ...
^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llustrates how many minutes in billions of telephone calls used at UK, including...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ne accounts for highest minutes. And it wasnt increases at all the time like national...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increases continuity for all the period it reached at 90 billion minutes in 1999...
^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...it reached at 90 billion minutes in 1999 . From 1999 to 2002, it decreases continu...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...35 billion minutes and after 7 years it increase about 25 billion minutes. A similar tre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...A similar trend was witnessed in mobiles all calls which increase slightly in 4 ...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rend was witnessed in mobiles all calls which increase slightly in 4 years since...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91715976331 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76396110118 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508875739645 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5740739834 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0205601316758 0.215688989381 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0127066737268 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311248669586 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0222366790218 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385150578574 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.