The bar chart shows the distribution of employment among agriculture, services, industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020
The three bar charts illustrate the proportion of three areas, namely agriculture, industry and services, were occupied in three different countries in 1980 and create a prediction for those in 2020.
It is clear from the charts that the figures for Agriculture are projected to experience a downward trend in all nations, the opposite is true for Service.
In 1980, the main jobs in territory A and C was Services, at approximately 45% and 65%, followed by Industry, at 30% and about 40%, sequentially. The workforce in country C barely participated in professions relating to Agriculture, with around 4% that was just equal one in five compared to country A. The following 40 years, Both nations are expected to see a fall about a half in total of workers in a particular career, for country A is Agriculture and Country C is Industry, and hoped that a rise will happen in Services.
Regard to country B, on the other hand, Agriculture is anticipated that has been the most popular vacancies from 1980 to 2020. The percentage of people who were employees in Industry and Services were 20% and 25% in 1980, respectively, and are forecast to double.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-03 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
- The chart gives information about the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries 2000 2012 92
- Some say that sports play an important role in society Others however think that it is nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 61
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88324873096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97773610553 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.5814520918 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.428571429 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271586991407 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113663217337 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744668962342 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160193720924 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749764268311 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.