The bar chart provides information about the percentage of divorces in the countries Finland and Sweden in between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, Sweden experienced a downward trend, while Finland showed an upward trend throughout the time period. Both countries have some fluctuations. Although initially Finland had low rates at the starting , it overtook Sweden at the end.
Sweden divorce rate was about 45 percent in 2011, which was higher than approximately 8 percent of Finland's. Then it increased almost 50 percent in 2012. However, the chart shows the gradual decrease in the rate about 47 percent in 2013 and continued to decline 45 percent in 2014. At the end of 2015 the percentage hit 37 percent.
Percentage of divorces in Finland was less than 40 percent in 2011, and it decreased in 2012 to around 33 percent . However, the chart shows the gradual increase by next two years. It rose to approximately 39 percent in 2013, then increased 3 percent in 2014. After that it remains steady for the next year and it is higher than Sweden.
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000
- The graph below shows relative rates of language acquisition according to different study methods 69
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ly Finland had low rates at the starting , it overtook Sweden at the end. Swede...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2013 and continued to decline 45 percent in 2014. At the end of 2015 the percent...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and continued to decline 45 percent in 2014. At the end of 2015 the percentage ...
^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t decreased in 2012 to around 33 percent . However, the chart shows the gradual in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93785310734 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66170486024 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570621468927 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2146466689 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.8333333333 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155993954856 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659677643456 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736589193163 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126064241427 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864637021362 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.