The bar chart gives information about the percentage of divorce rates in Finland and Sweden during a five year time period between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, the divorce rate in Finland experienced an upward trend, while Sweden showed a downward trend throughout the period. Both the countries experienced fluctuation. Although Finland initially had a lower rate, it outraced Sweden at the end of the period.
At the beginning of the period, Sweden had a divorce rate of 45%, which is higher than Finland by approximately 8%. Then, it increased to almost 50%. However, the figure showed a gradual decrease to about 47% in 2013, and then continued to decline steadily to the end of the period, reaching around 45% in 2014 and hitting a low point of about 37% in 2015.
Percentage of divorces in Finland is less than 40% in 2011, and it decreased in 2012, where half of the marriages ended with a divorce. However, the figure experienced a steady growth during the next two years. It rose to almost 40% in 2013, and increased by 3% during 2014. After that, it remained steady in 2015, outracing the rate of Sweden.
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on construction new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe that money should be spent on improving public transport. discuss both views and 56
- Some people say that government should brake down all the historical building and replace them with modren buildings. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- Reduce the accidents on Balmer island 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81347150259 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57634378853 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8040439999 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4545454545 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176277918321 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664686204255 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578515964996 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12333310804 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588680450315 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.