The bar chart demonstrates the European young generation’s views towards changes in the coming 20 years across 5 different areas namely health, air quality, water quality, food quality and people communication.
Overall, it is apparent that the majority of the participants do not have high expectations on the improvement of most mentioned aspects. Among which, air quality is the main concern with the lowest score and people communication is the sole prospective developed area.
To start with, people communication is predicted to improve in the next 20 years with a support rate of over 60%, which is almost 3 times higher than that of air quality at only about 23%. Moreover, food quality is the only area that has a balanced rate at 50% for both supporters of development and of deterioration.
While the two aforementioned aspects have a positive trend, all other areas have a lower-than-average expectation from the young generation in Europe. These youngsters share relatively similar expectations for health and water quality, with approximately 40% of them being in favor of improvement. Meanwhile, air quality is the least prospective aspect, at merely 23% of the surveyed young people holding positive opinions on its future improvement.
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 84
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 70
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food quality and people communication. Overall, it is apparent that the majorit...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is the sole prospective developed area. To start with, people communication is p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs of development and of deterioration. While the two aforementioned aspects hav...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive opinions on its future improvement.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37878787879 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24033492584 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5859452439 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28808974586 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108503601942 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106455390809 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174297830971 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119003572354 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food quality and people communication. Overall, it is apparent that the majorit...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is the sole prospective developed area. To start with, people communication is p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs of development and of deterioration. While the two aforementioned aspects hav...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive opinions on its future improvement.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37878787879 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24033492584 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5859452439 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28808974586 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108503601942 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106455390809 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174297830971 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119003572354 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.