The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart presents information about change in the number of visitors in three London museums over a five-year period from 2007 until 2012.
Overall, it is clear that visitor numbers change was gradually increased in National Gallery and possessed the most attracted place. Meanwhile, the popularity in Victoria and Albert Museum significantly decrease lower than the initial year, at 2007. Despite decline in 2008, the figures for British Museum increase over the period to roughly 14 million in 2012.
According to the graph, the number of visitor in Nation Gallery was only 6 million in 2007, which was the lowest comparing with other places. However, this number grew steadily, reaching over 10 million in 2003. Then the number remained constant approximately 11 million from 2010 to 2011, before increasing to over 15 million in 2012.
However, the number of visitors in Victoria and Albert Museum was higher than British Museum in 2007, 13 million and 12 million respectively. Over the next three years, this figure fell gradually to 7 million, which was lower than British Museum’s visitors. Although, there was then a rise to 10 million, popularity in other two museums still higher. While in 2011 saw people visiting in British museum reaching to over 10 million, in 2012 the number of visitors finished at 14 million.
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 89
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 48
- In some countries, young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard for their study.What do you think the causes and what solutions can you suggest? 89
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003. 61
- Fast foods are bad. Do you agree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17351598174 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57571486022 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543378995434 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.5139075475 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198499036916 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933574404459 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790306028046 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16416340009 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941882967761 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.