The bar graph gives information about how many people per year visited three London Museums over half of a decade, from 2007 onward.
At the first glance, it is clear that National Gallery and British museums attracted the largest spectators in 2012 though Victoria and Albert Museum was more popular in early year.
As the data suggests, in 2007, the number of visitors to Victoria and Albert Museum was by far the highest, at about 13 million, while that of National Gallery and British Museum was at 6 and 12 mil respectively. During the next three years, Victoria and Albert Museum experienced a significant fall to just over 6 million in terms of spectator’s number in 2010. From then on, this figure increased gradually to 10 million.
In the period from 2007 to 2008, there was a dramatic decrease to 6 million in the figure for tourists to British Museum. This figure remained unchanged in 2009, but this then inclined noticeably to less than 15 million in 2012. On the other hand, National Gallery witnessed a steady growth to 16 million in the number of visitors in 2012, which became the most popular museum in UK for visitors at the end of the period.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: meerakuna
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'mils'.
Suggestion: mils
...lery and British Museum was at 6 and 12 mil respectively. During the next three yea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73039215686 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49190828121 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7945977117 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190740692401 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085918777701 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052934267162 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124352840306 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224566765082 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.