the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010
The bar charts compare the percentage of young people who attend in higher education in 4 different countries in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
It is clear that there were two other trends occurred in the given period, While, in country A and D the amount of students going to college were higher compared to the others. In contrast, country B had the lowest percentage of college students.
According to the charts, the figures in country D hit the highest point at all stages with around 60% in 2000, nearly 65% and almost 80% in 2005 and 2010 respectively. The similar pattern can be seen from country A and the upward one came from country B and C.
In 2000, the proportion for the first 2 countries both started off at nearly 40% undergraduate student. And then the number of country A rose up to almost 50% in 2005 and then rocketed to around 58% in 2010, On the other hand, the figure for country B and C experienced the same tendency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- More people than ever before are travelling to other countries now Why Is this a positive development or negative development 84
- table 11
- the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in r different countries from 1997 to 2010 73
- the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 73
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to the university in order to travel or to work Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lowest percentage of college students. According to the charts, the figures in ...
^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he upward one came from country B and C. In 2000, the proportion for the first 2 ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47953216374 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5087242188 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.877372001 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2570760602 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137948645952 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210623447965 0.0843802449381 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215091995798 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250149800475 0.0819641961636 305% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.