The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010

The chart illustrates the proportion of the younger generation in higher education over a period of 10 years.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the percentage of the young attending higher education in countries A, C, and D increased, except for country B. In addition, nation D had the highest proportion of young people in higher education, while the lowest figures were seen in country B in all three years.
Turning to the chart for the detail, in 2000, young people who attended higher education accounted for 45% of the total of number of people in country D, in comparison with 35% of those in country A. During the following 10 years, these figures grew significantly to end the period, at about 60% and 58% respectively.
In terms of the other countries, the percentage of youngster in higher education made up 40% of the country B’s population, which was lower than that of country C (42%). Over the next 10 years, the figure for nation B remained relatively unchanged, despite a minimal drop in 2005. By contrast, the figure for country C rose slightly to about 48% throughout the following 5 years, before staying stable in the last 5 years.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, except for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78606965174 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75180601166 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557213930348 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3084352192 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237618257277 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10796178272 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833944638524 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159189495616 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450457479404 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.