The chart illustrates the proportion of the younger generation in higher education over a period of 10 years.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the percentage of the young attending higher education in countries A, C, and D increased, except for country B. In addition, nation D had the highest proportion of young people in higher education, while the lowest figures were seen in country B in all three years.
Turning to the chart for the detail, in 2000, young people who attended higher education accounted for 45% of the total of number of people in country D, in comparison with 35% of those in country A. During the following 10 years, these figures grew significantly to end the period, at about 60% and 58% respectively.
In terms of the other countries, the percentage of youngster in higher education made up 40% of the country B’s population, which was lower than that of country C (42%). Over the next 10 years, the figure for nation B remained relatively unchanged, despite a minimal drop in 2005. By contrast, the figure for country C rose slightly to about 48% throughout the following 5 years, before staying stable in the last 5 years.
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts give information about world forests in five different regions 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78606965174 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75180601166 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557213930348 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3084352192 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237618257277 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10796178272 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833944638524 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159189495616 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450457479404 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.