The bar chart shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance.
The graph demonstrates the number of people in two distinct age groups chose elements having effects on their work operation.
It is clear that the most striking feature of the chart is that nearly all categories affected the 18-30 age group more than people who aged from 45 to 60.
More specifically, opportunity for individual improvement having the greatest rate by the former at approximately 90 people, was roughly double that of the older group (40 people). Similar pattern can be seen at job security, easy working environment, chance for being appointed higher positions in the future while there was nearly no difference between two age groups opting for unite of team, job satisfaction, work environment salary at roughly 60, 50, 30 and 70 people, respectively.
Regard with the rest of categories, slightly more people in the 45-60 age group more than the younger one chose the element of competent chief and respect from colleagues at around 50 people and 40 people, respectively.
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The plans show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 78
- The chart shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11656441718 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82436557696 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662576687117 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0758273826 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.8 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235985136012 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13685915902 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640385645808 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156714220861 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542619984342 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.