The bar graph on average weekly household expenditure by region, 2007-09
The given bar graph details the statistical report showing the weekly spendings on an average in the houses from 10 regions over a period of 3 years from 2007 to 2009.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the city of London witnessed the maximum household expenditures followed next by Southeast, however, the least was observed in Northeast.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, more than 5oo euros were spent by the London residents, which was just 20 euros more than the Southeast region. Moreover, Whilst England and Southeast stayed on par with each other, at just below 500 euros, by contrast, Southwest spent merely 10 euros fewer than the east region.
Furthermore, although the expenditure in Northwest and East Midlands showed a similar figure(nearly 420 euros), the West Midlands exceeded by just a minor difference of 20 euros only. Besides this, Yorkshire the Humber and Northeast observed the lowest spendings, the former stood at exactly 400 euros compared to the latter, with 380 euros as weekly spendings.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The Chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia 78
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 73
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, with 380 euros as weekly spendings.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25433526012 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71805405309 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658959537572 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 13.4494940012 43.030603864 31% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 151.5 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183455277874 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832638941485 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879436230371 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112715772447 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955310697617 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.