The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in the UK.
The bar chart provided illustrates the spending on 3 distinct kinds of fast food namely hamburger, fish and chips and pizza by income groups in the U.K. in 1990.
It is evident that al of the given income groups spent most of their money on hamburgers, while the opposite was true of pizzas.
As can be seen from the bar chart given, in the high income group, there were 42 million pounds being spent on hamburgers, which was the largest amount compared to other groups. Spending on pizza and fish and chips were accounted for 19 and 17 million pounds, respectively.
Regarding the chart, people in the average income spent 32.5 million pounds on hamburger, which was 2 times larger than those in the low income group. The expenditure on fish and chips of average income group was reported nearly 10 millions higher than that of low income. The amount of money used for pizza of the average income and the low income groups were 12 and 7 million pounds, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-02 | phanthanhtung | 73 | view |
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 53
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 92
- The table below shows the hours of leisure time spent by people in different age groups in Someland Link https www ielts exam net academic writing samples task 1 104 This is an IELTS Task 1 please help me correct it 77
- The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in the UK. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69005847953 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38322569513 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5422818727 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280187934354 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142269296376 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547069114577 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167226888706 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594132025772 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.