the column chart show us the number about the average life expectancy in various countries in 2008 and the table graph presents us the change of these figures compared with those in 1958.
Overall, the life expectancy in Japan was the highest between 1953 and 2008, Whereas, Indonesia had a lowest life expectancy in both 1953 and 2008 even though the increase was the highest.
It’s clear that the rich countries such as japan and U.S had a very high life expectancy between 1953 and 2008.
As given number, the life expectancy in japan is about 80 years old in 2008, the number only had a small rise of 3.5 years compares with 1953. followed by U.S, the number of life expectancy in 2008 was 78, increased by 3 years, compares with 1953. Probing further, for the development countries such as Korea and Indonesia, the life expectancy was more less than rich countries.The life expectancy in Indonesia was 73 years, Which grew by 15.7 years since 1953. but it was still the lowest in four countries. while Korea was also a big rise by 12.5 years in life expectancy, was to 76.5 years.
- The bar graph gives us the information about the life expectancy in Japan ,United states ,Korea and Indonesia and the table shows us the life expectancy between 1953 and 2008 .summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 61
- The table shows the percentage of very good rated by first year students. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the column chart show us the number about t...
^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...n 1953 and 2008, Whereas, Indonesia had a lowest life expectancy in both 1953 and...
^
Line 8, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... the rich countries such as japan and U.S had a very high life expectancy between...
^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...l rise of 3.5 years compares with 1953. followed by U.S, the number of life expectancy i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...years compares with 1953. followed by U.S, the number of life expectancy in 2008 ...
^
Line 9, column 348, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
... and Indonesia, the life expectancy was more less than rich countries.The life expectancy...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 378, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tancy was more less than rich countries.The life expectancy in Indonesia was 73 ye...
^^^
Line 9, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untries.The life expectancy in Indonesia was 73 years, Which grew by 15.7 years s...
^^
Line 9, column 463, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...s, Which grew by 15.7 years since 1953. but it was still the lowest in four countri...
^^^
Line 9, column 510, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...was still the lowest in four countries. while Korea was also a big rise by 12.5 years...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73056994819 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42889705983 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3678156173 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353561143351 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173595975755 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911542113361 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250446487801 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029173521005 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.