The bar graph illustrates the number of people who used public transport in a town between 2011 and 2015.
The bar graph illustrates the number of people who used public transport in a town between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, Tram was the least preferred form of transport but the number of passengers increase dramatically at the end, while the figures for bus and train fluctuated during the entire period.
In 2012, the number of passengers travelled in tram was minimal with nearly 20 and the figures increased in next two years, which more than doubled in 2014, finally, peaked at just below 100 at the end.
On the other hand, train was the most used public transport in 2012 with nearly three quarters and then the values dropped significantly to just below 15 in 2013. Although the numbers increased in 2014 and 2015 with just above 50, it did not peak as in 2012. The preference for bus was not stable starting at just above 12 in 2012 and the values fluctuated between 40 and 60 over the recorded period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-11 | SaranyaJeevesh | 78 | view |
- The line graph depicts the amount of spreads namely Margarine, low fat & reduced spreads, and butter consumed between 1981 and 2007. 78
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests but based on the kinds of jobs they can get To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 81
- The pie chart illustrate the proportion of electricity produced by different fuels such as oil, coal, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power. 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- ake a look at the graphic and complete the task The table and chart show data from a survey of library users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68944099379 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4015510079 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1192666378 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30008661346 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21877925015 0.103423049105 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.35040103526 0.0843802449381 415% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301367290069 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.40459270404 0.0819641961636 494% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.