The illustration gives information about the changes in the global sales of four different types of digital games: mobile phone games, online games, console games and handheld games during a period of 6 year.
As can be seen clearly from the bar chart, the sales of handheld games all over the world keeps the largest throughout the period shown. While the sales of console games have a slight drop during the period, the figure for mobile phone games and online games rise steadily.
In 2000, both mobile phone games and online games had zero sales in whole world. Meanwhile, the sales of console games and handheld games were about 6 billion and 10 billion respectively. In the year 2004, the figure for handheld games increased gradually to nearly 15 billion. The sales of console games decreased to 5 billion, whereas both sales of mobile phone games and online games were approximately 4 billion.
The global sales of handheld games peaked at roughly 17 billion in 2006, while the figure for console games bottomed out 3 billion. At the same time, the number of mobile phone games and online games reached a peak at about 7 billion and 9 billion respectively.
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant. 87
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 87
- the pie charts show the expenditures of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'game'.
Suggestion: game
...nearly 15 billion. The sales of console games decreased to 5 billion, whereas both sa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37779309445 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8757937208 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324526468857 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170666665243 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565923272994 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213820521423 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397027903278 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.