The bar graph compares and contrasts data on the change in the number of employees in the five different departments of an area in the Australian continent for two years with a difference of nine years.
In an overview, there is a slight rise in the figures of employees in three departments (sales, computing, and nursing), whereas two departments (accounting and farming) show a gradual decline.
Firstly, the sales department, which had the maximum number of employees in both the years, in 2001 it had 1,80,000 staff members, and by 2008 it reached to an approx value of 1,90,000. Similarly, in the computing and nursing department, the employee count was 1 lakh and 40,000, respectively, and by 2008 it grew to a near value of 1,10,000 and 50,000, respectively. All these departments showed an increase of 10,000 members.
Secondly, the accounting department, which had about half the number of employees when compared to the sales department, witnessed a decrease of nearly 10,000 employees in eight years and reached 80,000. Even the farming department, which had the least number of employees, saw a fall of staff by 10,000 and reached the lowest count of only 20,000 representatives.
- The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows information about the amount of money spent on alcohol and drugs Summarize the info by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 78
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 88
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11224489796 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99445899505 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6349260376 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.142857143 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0776348506342 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442511921236 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349492035001 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566719952273 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397833697637 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.