The Bar chart compares and contrasts data on the amount of dollars drained for the consumption of alcohol and drugs in five different years (1975, 77, 80, 85 & 92).
In an overview, the expenditure on alcohol is more than on drugs, and despite of some fluctuations they seem to rise.
Firstly, the money spent on alcohol in 1975 and 1992 is similar with 146 and 148 billion dollars respectively. In between, the expenditure is fluctuating. In 1977 it had a dip of 6 billion dollars and reached a level of 140 billion dollars, but only after 3 years it rose by 46 billion to reach the highest of 186 billion. Five years later, it slummed to 104 billion dollars , which is 82 billion less.
Secondly, the drugs purchases are not far behind, it also witness a growth in its market. The year 1992 saw a consumption of 98 billion dollars and starting year 1997 had only one third businesses i.e. 35 billion of dollars. Similarly, 1997 had 46 billion drainage of money, which grew to double of its value in 1980 and reaching a mark of 102 billion. Although in next 5 years the value decreased to 65 billion, which is approx of two third of 1980 value.
- The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countriesbetween 1990 and 1999
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 88
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 78
- The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 11
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...later, it slummed to 104 billion dollars , which is 82 billion less. Secondly, ...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'witnesses'?
Suggestion: witnesses
...s purchases are not far behind, it also witness a growth in its market. The year 1992 s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54326923077 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57420044606 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6523491512 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569871416198 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282229841565 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356594559957 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434340559041 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022711378985 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...later, it slummed to 104 billion dollars , which is 82 billion less. Secondly, ...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'witnesses'?
Suggestion: witnesses
...s purchases are not far behind, it also witness a growth in its market. The year 1992 s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54326923077 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57420044606 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6523491512 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569871416198 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282229841565 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356594559957 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434340559041 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022711378985 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.