The bar graph shows the rentals and annual sales of DVD , VHS and Blu- ray films from a shop during 2002 and 2011
The bar chart gives the information about the yearly number of rentals and 'VHS, DVD and Blu-ray sales' of movies from a particular store during 2002 - 2011.
It can be seen from given information that in 2007, the annual number of the DVD sales were the highest (about 2,15,000), while the sales were least (45,000) in 2000. The yearly sales of DVD continuously decreased during last 4 years and reached to 1,70,000 in the final year. Interestingly, in 2002, the sales of the VHS were maximum (84,000), and rapidly fell to 11,000 in 2005, and suddenly disappeared in 2006.
Furthermore, in between 2002 and 2011, the annual rentals of the films marginally dropped. The yearly rentals of films began from 1,83,000 in 2002, which were the maximum, but then, the figure started to decrease, and lastly hit on the figure of 57,000 in 2011. However, the sales of Blu-ray ray films just initiated in 2007 at 2,000 and slowly progressed and surged to 13,000 in 2011.
Overall, it can be noticed that the customers who watched the movies on rents became least popular in the market. While, few others such as Blu-ray sales had been started to become popular among the customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-25 | Bhardwaj gourav | 73 | view |
- The bar graph shows the annual rentals and sales of VHS, DVD and Blu-ray films from a shop during 2002 and 2011 73
- Universities should take the equal number of males and females in all major courses. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- The bar graph shows the annual sales of VHS , DVD and Blu- ray and rentals of films from a shop during 2002 and 2011. 84
- See GHG DG 11
- Universities should take the equal number of males and females in all major courses. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, lastly, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80198019802 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39354126199 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5721276332 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37753470582 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166962044116 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121691981038 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249183662703 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140467291044 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.