The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The bar chart illustrates the proportions of movie-goers in one European country on different days of the week from 2003 to 2007.
Overall, the number of people visiting the cinemas in that country witnessed a small fluctuation over the examined period. In addition, people there tend to go to the cinemas the most on weekend.
In 2003, the percentage of movie-goers was 10% on Monday, a third of that on Friday and Sunday while it reached a peak of 40% on Saturday. Over the next 2 years, there was a marginal increase of about 5% on three continuous days: Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. However, the year 2007 recorded a slight drop of about 3% on the same days and the highest point was nearly 44% on Saturday.
Looking at Tuesday, the number of cinema-goers was 20% but constantly decreased after 2 days and stopped at 13% on Thursday. Then, this figure rose considerably to 30% on the next day, which remained stable in 2005 and 2007. The proportion of people coming to the cinemas in 2005 decreased roughly from nearly 14% to below 10% on 2 days: Wednesday and Thursday. In contrast, that number over 2 years saw an increase of 4%.
- Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one s own family Why do people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 61
- The plans below show the layout of a conference room in which training sessions with different numbers of people can be held Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of a bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65346534653 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65870621789 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4251843651 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269051518848 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959360871257 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942901979304 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173360403648 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105551325725 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.