Below is a chart showing how many hours per week an average person spent on various kinds of media, including watching television, surfing on the Internet, listening to the radio and reading printed material. The years covered are from 1990 to 2005.
The number of average hours spending on different kinds of media per individual per week is described for four types of media: television, Internet, radio and printed material. The information provided is for the year 1990 to 2005.
As can be seen from the graph that two categories of media ended up having a lower average in 2005, while two others ended up with higher ones. In 1990, the average person spent around 25 hours watching television until 1996. A few years later, the hour of television gradually decreased until 1998, then dropped dramatically by 2005. The number of hours spent on printed material was at 7 hours in 1990, and although it fluctuated many times, it then decreased to 2.5 hours per week by 2005. Radio, on the other hand, started at just 4 hours per week and remained stable until 2003, then the number slowly increased to just under 5 hours. The data on the hours spent on the Internet showing a different trend. From the very first start to appear in 1993, the hours spent on this type of media steadily went up from 0 hours to 2 hours per week and consistently went up until 2001. From 2001 to 2005, it can be seen a tremendous trend in the time people spent on suffering the Internet, the average climbed up to 14 hours in 2005.
In conclusion, while printed material and radio do not change that much over the time period, it seems that the substantial rise of the Internet has a great effect on the average number of hours that an individual spends on television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-02 | HanhDao1911 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the city s population that does not have any sort of health insurance There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities
- Below is a chart showing how many hours per week an average person spent on various kinds of media including watching television surfing on the Internet listening to the radio and reading printed material The years covered are from 1990 to 2005 73
- This line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information 87
- The graph below shows that the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2000 78
- The graph belows shows that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...verage climbed up to 14 hours in 2005. In conclusion, while printed material an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58518518519 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42584393415 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.547580073 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.545454545 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4036390451 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16813316511 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646027511218 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261411020127 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796078425632 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.