Below is the map of Canterbury town. There is a plan of building a new school in this town where two possible sites (S1 and S2) have been proposed.
The map shows two potential locations (S1 and S2) for a new school in the town called Canterbury. The main difference between two sites is that S1 located in the south of Canterbury whereas S2 is in the west of that town. Moreover, The sites can also be compared in terms of amenities around both of them.
Looking at the information in more detail, S1 positioned in the southern town center is placed in zone that has no congestion. However, s2 is located in countryside area which is in to the north-west of town center.
Turning to other comparisons, There are two difference main roads around the sites proposed. While, S2 is closer to Sturry which has distance around 5 km from town center and has 7000 people in that place, S2 is near of Chartham –7 km from town center– having 4500 populations. In addition, these potential locations are positioned around the housing of Canterbury town. S1 in the border of residential areas although S2 is placed in the center of residential location. Nevertheless, the exception is university located in the north of the town which has a far distance from two new schools planned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | minhthanh211 | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | sasachic | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | sasachic10 | 67 | view |
- Too much money is spent on maintaining and repairing old buildings Some people think that they should be knocked down to give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The graph below depicts the percentage change in average house prices in five cities from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 89
- The bar chart below shows information about water use worldwide (Km3) from three different sectors between 1910 and 2010. 84
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world especially among young people Identify the possible causes of this trend and propose solutions you think would be effective 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...near of Chartham –7 km from town center– having 4500 populations. In addition, th...
^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... distance from two new schools planned.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80506473572 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505102040816 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3883201247 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349330926161 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149017605458 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854695860752 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250463462001 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821368989328 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.