The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting on the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Both charts showed the data of applicants who participated in the Olympic games from 1924 to 2012.
The bar chart compared the quantity of male and female athletes involved in the Olympics from 1924 to 2012. The line graph, meanwhile, showed the highest figure for contestants during four periods.
According to the chart, it is easy to see that men taking part in the Olympics was consistently higher than women. Since 1924, men have significantly reached a peak of 1,000 people per year, which achieved the highest value with 6,000 contestants in 2012. Whilst, the number of female participants increased steadily to 1984, to 1,500 people, and witnessed a dramatic rocket to approximately 5, 000 members until 2012.
The line graph, on the other hand, had quite the same trend as the bar graph. Since 1924, the number of applicants had gradually risen by 2,000 people in each year and climbed to more than 3,000 members in 2012. This data had tripled compared to 1924.
In conclusion, both charts showed data on the Olympics athlete numbers during four periods. There was a big change between male and female participants, especially among women, while most partakers took part in the Olympics in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | WindOlivia | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | WindOlivia | 78 | view |
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government have to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family Give rea 84
- The maps below show how Science Park has changed from 2008 until now 84
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary reasons of loss of biodiversity What solutions can be suggest Write at least 250 words 84
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summaries the information by selecting and reporting on the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99504950495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56248737268 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1630083673 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7272727273 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102221928874 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044389057035 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304208239232 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686501824389 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270670686578 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.