The rendered bar chart delineates information about the number of men and female participates in the Olympics and line graph shows the total number of participants from year 1924 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear that number of male players was more as compared to female whereas with the passage of time the count of participants were increased.
As the bar chart shows, in year 1924, the number of men players was 3000 who entered the Olympics but the count of females stood at about hundred females. Furthermore, in 1952, about 4500 males have participated and in case of females it was only 500. The participation of mens was increased in year 1984, which was reached at 5100 men. While the female participation was approximately 1900. In 2012, the number of male players reached at its peak point which was 6000. However, the count of female players were only 4900.
Probing further, from 1924 to 1952, the total number of participants were increased from 3000 to 5000 than in 1984. It was stood at about 6800 participants. Whereas, the count of male and female players in Olympic silver at highest point which was over 10,000 in 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation about the number of men and female participates in the Olympics and line gr...
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ar that number of male players was more as compared to female whereas with the pas...
^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs was 3000 who entered the Olympics but the count of females stood at about hund...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ut the count of females stood at about hundred females. Furthermore, in 1952, about 45...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ar 1984, which was reached at 5100 men. While the female participation was approximat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82233502538 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.596157647 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477157360406 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5177742052 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3636363636 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17306550822 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760138087481 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760458631854 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122212065258 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807460973915 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.