The bar chart illustrates the ratio of 3 categories (Men, Women and children) of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables in each day in the UK between 2001 and 2008 which is measured in percentage.
Overall, there was a steady rising until 2006 in all categories. However, after 2006, they experienced a diminishing. The woman ate fruit and vegetables more than others. In contrast, the lowest ratio was belong to the children.
A more detailed look at this bar chart reveals, at the beginning of the period, the percentage of people who ate fruit and vegetables retain steady until 2003 for men and children, about 12 percent and 16 percent respectively. After 2003 the percentage of eating them was grown and it reached to approximately 20% and 28% (roughly doubled) for children and men respectively in 2007 but in 2008 it decreased about 2 percent for both groups.
According to the bar chart, the ratio of eating fruit and vegetables in women was more than other groups in all years. In 2001, women ate fruit and vegetables around 20% and it calculated slightly over 30% in 2006 and after 2006 at the end of the period, this group experienced decreased.
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- Due the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a dramatic change to people’s lives. Is it a positive or negative development?Give your opinion and examples. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...hers. In contrast, the lowest ratio was belong to the children. A more detailed look ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77832512315 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70846380175 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512315270936 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.864677161 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290867403768 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115123118075 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128583689706 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198331744645 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136909477731 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.