The chart bellow shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits if five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart bellow shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits if five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The following chart illustrates the percentages of five Australian cities’ population interest in drinking and buying coffee or tea in last four weeks.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, people in all five cities mostly appealed to go to a café for coffee or tea in last four weeks. Unlike Adelaide which this percentage was slightly under 50%, the percentages in all other four cities of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Hobart were more than 55%. They were slightly above 60%, near 65%, a bit more than 55%, and above 60%, respectively.
Moreover, 45% of Sydney’s residents, below 50% of Melbourne’s dwellers, and above 50% of people who live in Brisbane tended to buy instant coffee in the last month. The tendency to purchase instant coffee in Hobart was around 55%. Followed by Brisbane with a bit less than 50%. Approximately as much percentage of Sydney’s residents as Melbourne’s residents preferred to buy fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks which was around 43%. The same pattern can be seen in Brisbane and Adelaide dwellers’ habit of buying fresh coffee at the same time by nearly 45%. This share in Hobart was something between the previous two groups which is around 40%.
It is clear from the chart that whereas there are significant similarities between Sydney, Melbourne, and Hobart’ residents on drinking and buying habit of tea or coffee, people who live in Adelaide and Brisbane show different behavior at the same period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01229508197 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71981429781 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520491803279 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2653101295 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.181818182 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179828364903 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744958777257 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783554359695 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145760181008 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069170566319 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.