The chart bellow shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart bellow shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The graph depicts the average of minutes (by billions) of telephone conversation in the UK, accounted from three types, i.e. local-fixed line, national and international line, as well as mobile phones between 1995 and 2002.

Overall, both national-international line services and mobile phones experienced a graduate increase in the given period. By contrast, local-fixed line, although possessed bigger portion of usage in 1999 onward, somehow begin to decrease in the end of the given sequence.

Firstly, the number of telephone calls trough national and international services gradually escalated from approximately 38 billion minute calls 1995 to reach just beyond 60 billion minutes annually in the end of 2002. Similarly, the mobile phone services, which the tiniest portions in the initial period, showed a considerable growth over the years, i.e. from nearly 2 billion minute calls in 95 to about 45 billion minute phone-conversations in 2002. On the other hand, local-line services that stood at just after 70 billion minutes in 1995, convincingly rose to 90 billion in 1998 onward and remained stable to 1999, before it dropped gradually to reach just above 70 billion minute calls in 2002 respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-02 Dolang 78 view
Essays by user Dolang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion minute calls in 2002 respectively.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, similarly, so, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44973544974 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17016444539 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1279508585 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.666666667 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200640319413 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104982028633 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802652873876 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124851550655 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916370121958 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.