The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

From the chart of average weekly spending by families in 1968 and 2018, we can not only find the great changes in the outcome of families in this country,but also the life style improvements of them.

In 1968, families took 35% of the weekly income to purchase food that took the most part of a family members' weekly salary. Then the housing and clothing as well as footware took 10% each of that.As for the purchasing household, personal goods, they took less than 10%. For transportation and the lesure spending they were approximate 8% and 9%.the lowes spending was on fuel and power.

As the time went to 2018, things changed a lot. First and foremost, the money spending on food reduced to about 17% of average weekly income which was only the half of that in 1968. It was also noticable that the families would pay more money on Leisure since it was 22% of that income which doubled comparing with that in 1968.Moreover, there was an increasing in housing purchasing, rised to 19%, which was nearly two times than that 50 years ago. There was also another increasing in transport which took 14%.The money on houshold goods equalized with that in 1968.However, we can find that in 2018 the moeny took on clothing and footware as well as the personal goods saw the declining which just the half of that in 1968.

In general, we can find people in this country will spent more money on spirirual life than the basic life necessities.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
... the outcome of families in this country,but also the life style improvements of the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
... well as footware took 10% each of that.As for the purchasing household, personal ...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ich doubled comparing with that in 1968.Moreover, there was an increasing in housing pur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... increasing in transport which took 14%.The money on houshold goods equalized with ...
^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...shold goods equalized with that in 1968.However, we can find that in 2018 the moeny too...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...we can find people in this country will spent more money on spirirual life than the b...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, as for, in general, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67058823529 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45417517275 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7970495305 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133387829014 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633840523743 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051296788154 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850073870511 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303606540779 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.