The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent
their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart details how did families in one country spend their weekly revenue in 1968 and 2018.
Overall, the amount of money spend on food, fuel and power, clothing and foot ware, and personal goods decreased, that for housing, transport, and leisure experienced a reserved trend.
In 1968, the percentage of families' weekly income spent on food was 35%, which was the highest among all categories. Earning expended on housing increased from 10% in 1968 to around 19% in 2018. The year 2018 witnessed a slight decrease in the percentage of money allocated for fuel and power, from 6% to 4%. The percentage of expenditure on clothing and footwear in 1968 was more significant than in 2018, at 10% and 5% respectively. Families’ spent weekly revenue on household goods remained around more than 5% from 1968 to 2018. The proportion of expenses on personal goods in 2018 accounted for 4%, which is lower than that in 1968. Weekly income allocated for both transport and leisure observed a dramatic rise.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94705882353 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61857220928 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8738086699 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206866415806 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098126301182 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877014958538 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158141395411 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126762467729 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.