The given bar chart provides a comparison of the average weekly income allocated for disbursement by households in two specific years, 1968 and 2018.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the spending priority in 1968 went on food while the top belonged to expenditure for leisure aspect in 2018. The provided spending categories experienced both tendencies: one upward trend and the other downward trend whereas only household goods still remain stable in the 50-year period.
Initially observing at the upward group, there was a substantial increase comprising more than twice as much at the income expended for leisure aspect per week that reached a peak at the end of the period. Additionally, weekly salary for housing items made a near twofold jump, which accounted for a 10% to 20% increase during the interval. Furthermore, the share of average wage per week paid for transportation increased by roughly 7% as the former.
With regards to the remaining negative site, it is instantaneous that food demand plummeted from the precedence of families expenses (35% in 1968) to the third rank after a half century. Also, clothing and footwear and personal goods both caught a spectacular decrease as nearly two times as the former (about 5% and less, respectively). Following that, there was a minimal drop in expenditures on fuel and power expenses, and the share of these three categories mostly emerged as the least preferred items in the statistic over the years shown.
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 89
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, still, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16326530612 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81743840814 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636734693878 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.7575143885 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.555555556 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139873087962 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545177702645 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503573715977 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909460809458 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558461171732 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, still, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16326530612 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81743840814 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636734693878 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.7575143885 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.555555556 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139873087962 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545177702645 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503573715977 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909460809458 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558461171732 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.