The chart below gives information about how people aged 25-34 are housed in the UK.

The bar chart illustrates what percentage of British people who are 25-34 years old possesses either houses or not over the period 2004-2014.

Overall, it is an apparent fact that while the number of immobile proprietors is experienced a downtrend, whereas the uptrend is remarked for the figure of house renters.

It can be seen that the percentage of people who own their private houses in the first year was at around 60% which is the highest rate over the period of eleven years. However, in the next eight years, there was a slight decrease to approximately 41% in 2011 before a stable period to 2012. After that year onward, the trend continued to decrease at about 36% in 2014, which is the lowest rate in the period given.

In contrast, at the first year of the research, the proportion of immobile renters began with 20%, which was one third of the rate of house owners. However, there was a rapid increase during a period 2004- 2011, where a double number of renters was remarked. Finally, there was a modest increasing in 2014, at a rate around 48%, which was around 12% higher than the percentage of house owners.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...rates what percentage of British people who are 25-34 years old possesses either houses...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uses in the first year was at around 60% which is the highest rate over the perio...
^^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er than the percentage of house owners.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, third, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7135678392 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45324965667 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4266982158 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107358251979 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513065117708 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602354421537 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816780193317 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698170713891 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.