The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates the figure for social networking sites used in Canada between 2014 and 2015. Overall, people in Canada mostly used one site of social network, while the number of people used five sites was the least.
In both two years, one site of social network which had 36 percent of total users in 2014 and slightly decreased to 28 percent in 2015 was the most common site number. The second one was the percentage of people used two networking browses which witnessed the similar number of 23 percent in 2014 and 2015. Equivalently, the quantities of non-user of both years were approximate to each other and that of two sites. The number of people using three, four or five sites in 2015 was higher than that in 2014 from 2 to 4 percent. Five sites of social network had the lowest population in both years which was 2 percent in 2014 and 4 percent in 2015. Generally, the number of social network users in 2015 is gently higher than that in 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summary the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units) 73
- the picture illustrate the the working principals of a hot balloon 78
- People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54857142857 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30491931773 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445714285714 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4607296186 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299784999413 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174952515738 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832622595965 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288382097563 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668739578225 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.