The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the percentage of Canadian people using social networking sites between 2014 and 2015.
A first glance, it is evident that a large proportion of Canadians used only one site over a shown period. Whereas, the proportion of people using more than one site increased in 2015 as compared to 2016.
A close look reveals that the proportion of Canadians, who doesn't use any site, remained almost the same with only a one per cent decline in 2015 as compared to 2014. However, people using only one site was 36 per cent in 2014 and decline rapidly to 28 per cent in 2014. The percentage of Canadians using the two sites remained virtually the same with a slight increment of 1 per cent.
Moreover, the proportion of people using three sites stood at 12 per cent and increased to 16 per cent in one year period. The percentage of people using four sites saw an enormous climb by 3 per cent, which was 5 per cent in 2014 and reached 8 per cent in one year period. There was only 2 per cent of people using five sites which increased by 100 per cent in one year period to reach 4 per cent in 2015.
- More and more people today are moving away from where their friends and family live Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 56
- A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms Of the advertisin 54
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organizational rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s that the proportion of Canadians, who doesnt use any site, remained almost the same ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37320574163 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33876851029 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468899521531 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4239971602 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155430580209 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104956428588 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636747135699 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147441945091 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073574660894 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.