The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000. (Figures are given for the year, or the nearest year available).
The bar chart compares the proportion of adults with excess weight in four different countries over the next 3 decades from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that while the largest percentage of overweight adults were in the USA, Japan had the lowest percentage and that the USA experienced the most significant changes.
In 1980, the percentage of overweight adults in the USA and Australia stood at about 15% and 7.5% respectively. For the following ten years, while the percentage of overweight adults increased exponentially in the USA and accounted for 23%, Australia experienced a steady increase to about 10%. However, in 2000, the percentage raised significantly in both countries and comprised of about 20% for Australia and about 30% for the USA.
The percentage of adults with excess weight in Finland constituted at 7% in 1980 and then there was a slight increase by 7% in 1990, after ten years the percentage raised steadily to 10%. The percentage for Japan was the lowest among all countries which accounted no more that 4% in all years.
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public. 73
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extend do you agree? 56
- Parents and teachers believe that children should be supervised in their activities most of the time whereas others believe that kids need more freedom.To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
- Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages to this.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96629213483 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83923046664 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7843915077 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319230199276 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154288815998 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413230110578 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182428887579 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438100328097 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.