The chart below gives information about the ratio of income to spending (in dollars) by Americans by age range in 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the data of earning and expenditure which was divided by different age groups in America in 2013.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that, whereas layout and revenue both grew linearly with age, after 45 to 54 age group, the opposite trend was observed. In addition, the people who had aged below 25 spent more money than they earn, and those who aged over 75 had similar in both cases.
With regards to, among the first four groups, the persons who had aged between 45 to 54 had the highest amount of income and expenditure which was almost 8000 and 6000 dollars respectively. The previous group had nearly the same amount, on the contrary, the difference was seen in the first group, while their income, not more than 30000 dollars, they pay out more than they earn.
Then turns to the other three groups, in the graph we can see the income and expense both decrease with the increase of age. The man who had aged more than 75 earned approximately 35000 dollars, and it was equal in the case of expense. The other two groups income more than 50000 dollars but their expenses varied.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-03 | Sanaullah97 | 63 | view |
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 78
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 73
- In many countries a small number of people can earn extremely high salaries some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that government should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62686567164 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17812740766 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.68765971 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908754754105 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497328960504 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251927585001 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673043171858 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187152716513 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.