The chart shows the percentage of shares of science qualified people in Malaysia and Singapore. Qualifications are indicated in four rate categories, including a master, bachelor, school and no qualification.
It is evident, that the higher education degree people hold, the lowest percentage of scientists two countries meet. However, Malaysia seems to be more science-qualified country than Singapore, except for bachelor’s graduates, where Singapore has way higher indicators.
In terms of unqualified in the science people, Malaysia recognizes a majority of citizens, at about 66%, which is slightly over than that of Singapore at 60%. Furthermore, Malaysia accounts for 36% of those left school exams, compared to 30% in Singapore
Regarding the graph given, the figures in the bachelor’s degree profile have a reverse trend. Singapore citizens account for 20% of bachelor graduates, which is by 10% more than that of Malaysians. As for master in science degree, only 4% in both countries accounts for qualified graduates.
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 61
- The graph below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 84
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 41
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, as for, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55194805195 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26184156415 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0287927673 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140308059526 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636449127902 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477977508766 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931573261182 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461399302801 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.