The chart below gives information about social networking sites people used in Canada between 2014 and 2015 .
The following chart provides information on the numerous social networking sites people benefit from in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Overall, it has been noticed that people tend to use one site only thus having the highest percentage. However, only a few people use five sites and therefore it is shown that it has the lowest rate.
To begin with, how the usage of one site is at the peak grasps the attention; in addition, the variations between the consumption of one site and the others are enormous. Moreover, in 2015 the utilization of one site remains the highest but it has decreased from slightly more than three-tenths to approximately higher than a quarter.
On the other hand, the utilization of five sites has had the minimal percentages in 2014 and 2015. Furthermore, there is a drastic gap between the usage of five sites and the rest. Nonetheless, a small improvement has been spotted; the rates went from one percent higher than one-hundredth to one percent subtracted from one-twentieth.
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care issue , some people believe it is a good idea to have physical training classes , to what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary schoolDo the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Advantage essay 11
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment , why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem. 11
- Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries .Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities toward protecting the environment .Discuss both of these vi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The following chart provides information...
^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enefit from in Canada in 2014 and 2015. Overall, it has been noticed that ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is shown that it has the lowest rate. To begin with, how the usage of one site...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... approximately higher than a quarter. On the other hand, the utilization of fi...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ercent subtracted from one-twentieth.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00591715976 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87494814637 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.299380799 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5 5.23603664747 277% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281967943 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144384328389 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133218613655 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212723954809 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154781133928 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.