The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2021 and future projections for 2025.
The bar chart demonstrates basic exports of Southland during 2000 and 2021 and projection for 2025. Overal It can be seen that in different type of projections saw export earnings during the period past, present and future. It is clear from the chart that the leadest exports in 2000 was in meat products ;at present, it is dairy products and international tourism will be 2025. International tourism's exports were saw to earn 8 billions in 2000. And now, 2021, it has increased 9 billion. In 2025, it will be growing around 10 billions. Dairy products exports were achieved 7 billion pounds in the past, 2000, and that exports have seen to earn 10 billion in 2021. Afterwards, by 2025 dairy products exports will be predicting to earn money approximately 9,5 billion pounds. Export of meat products have had 6 billion pound in 2000. And now that exports are decline slightly the amount of 5.5.In 2025, meat exports will be guess the amount of 5.Turning to international tourism, almost a uniform growth is seen in the export value throughout the period (from 8 billion to an anticipated value of 10 billion pounds
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...25. International tourisms exports were saw to earn 8 billions in 2000. And now, 20...
^^^
Line 1, column 660, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exports have seen to earn 10 billion in 2021. Afterwards, by 2025 dairy products...
^^
Line 1, column 896, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... are decline slightly the amount of 5.5.In 2025, meat exports will be guess the am...
^^
Line 1, column 948, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Turning
...t exports will be guess the amount of 5.Turning to international tourism, almost a unif...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83246073298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6709987381 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.6036785771 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244733889258 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131180209776 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109474657251 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244733889258 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.